Troll thread? Nope. I am just tired of that loading screen! You know, the one where the camera is positioned from above, and the child's breasts are in full view? Children -- the huntress looks much less than 18 years old, especially in that particular image. She also appears to be the youngest of the bunch. Not attacking the artist. However, in the past, at Trendy, there have been documented gender discrimination issues and "up-sexing" of child characters. (Just look it up.) I would rather that unpleasant bit of history not repeat itself. I will also add to the list of annoyances -- the base huntress costume is disgraceful -- the "shorts" cut in the back... really? An empty square that shows her butt... oh sorry, "tights" .... yeah. It just looks gross, and I don't feel I should have to see that kind of stupidity. (And, before you get into another hissy fit, yes, I cover up my monk as well. Why heroes would go into battle naked is beyond me.....) Can you show us your source for her being a child, please? Seeing as you're the only one here who sees this cartoon as a sentient human being that is also under the legal age of consent (which, by the way, is not 18 in most parts of the world) then the burden of proof lies on you. Continuing off that, since when is it required for someone to be of age before trying to make themselves attractive? Are you suggesting highschoolers only wear long johns and sweaters? How on earth is a character dressing up as they / the artist sees fit "disgraceful", unless you're meaning bodies are inherently disgraceful?