Enclave

no

:D

I do

I unlocked it before the 27th but never got a free bearkira :(

Your English is fine :D anyway you raise a very good point, this would ruin the game the way diablo was ruined. Guess it's not a very good idea lol.

Would be awesome to bring back DD1 maps into DD2, I loved the maps from 1 and it would be awesome to play them on DD2!

That is true, But if there isn't a market we won't be running into bots. Myself I could care less if someone is buying items, But when I get to see bot advertisments every 5 seconds in the chat thats a whole other ball game. I agree, bots would definitely ruin the market. For sure but this game isnt setup like runescape so bots wouldnt be a problem! :D

I didnt get mine either

No.

Yea I don't say the trading between players won't happen, that update its on their hands, they should either think in a godly way to avoid cheating or just don't do it at all Okay well trading is happening, it was also a huge aspect of the first dd as well. So your point to my post isn't even valid. Thanks for trying to make a point though!

In fact it would happen, give players a small window to have advantage over others and they will do it, and no matter how hard you try to avoid mistakes players always find a way. Lets take two examples 1.- DD1 wasn't server side as far as I know (I didn't played it) and players where hacking the game because of that, and now its server side, why?, because it would happen again 2.- Since you took this idea from Runescape (as you stated), do you remember the time where Players could only trade a small amount of gold between them, and Grand Exchange wasn't a good way of transaction, well, after

This is not a pvp game, therefore there is no such thing as pay2win. Devs have already said pvp is likely not to happen and even if it does it won't be the main focus of the game.. But then again I go back to my main point, people would sell items for real world currency, and that is a problem mate Also trading is also confirmed to happen which is a way to sell items for real world currency which is very unlikely to happen. So either way your point isn't valid. Which also means a maximum price isn't needed if this economy becomes reality.

This is not a pvp game, therefore there is no such thing as pay2win. Devs have already said pvp is likely not to happen and even if it does it won't be the main focus of the game.. But then again I go back to my main point, people would sell items for real world currency, and that is a problem mate Which is why a minimum price to sell an item would be added which I stated in the original post, and if something like this occurs, set a maximum price to sell an item based off IPWR. That way there is no way to sell or buy coins or items with real world currency.. but it's not needed because

So you just realized that it could happen, and it would happen because there are tons of players who like Pay 2 Win, and once it happens this game will become a Pay2Win, that's why I don't think this is a good idea This is not a pvp game, therefore there is no such thing as pay2win. Devs have already said pvp is likely not to happen and even if it does it won't be the main focus of the game.. plus the amount of people who would go out of their way to buy coins from player would be a very tiny handful if even that. It's not like it would be a f2p pay2win game like that. Infact it probably

Not real cash in game cash the coins! I know, but people do it, I've seen it in other games, Subject A wants to buy X amount of gold in a game, so he pays Subject B through PayPal or whatever, Subject A puts a garbage item for the amount of gold he bought from Subject B, like a "wooden sword" for a million coins or whatever, and Subject B buys it from the "Grand Exchange" alike system That rarely happens unless it's a very social community game such as Arma III life or something. This would not be much of a problem at all in a game designed like this. The amount of people doing it would